Monthly Archives: November 2011

Top 15 Welfare States: 13-of-the-15 are Democrat States

Interesting: CNBC published the top 15 states in the Nation that consume the MOST in welfare. 13-of-15 are DEMOCRAT states; they went Blue in 2008.

The BIGGEST US WELFARE STATES

–Year Researched Data———2009————-2007————2008———-2009

State——-% of Pop on Welfare—–Spending on Welfare—-Total on Welfare—–Unemp

#1. California……………3.30%………………$3.28 BILLION………..1,212,893…….11.5%

#2. Maine………………..2.37%……………….$61.73 MILLION………..31,148……….8.3%

#3. Tennessee………….2.15%……………..$91.28 MILLION……….133,505……….10.7%

#4. Massachusetts…….2.09%…………….$295.29 MILLION………136,033………8.2%

#5. Vermont…………….2.02%……………..$30.92 MILLION………..12,543……..7.3%

#6. Wash DC…………..1.99%……………….$18.67 MILLION………..11,806………..10.7%

#7. New York…………..1.92%………………$1.47 BILLION…………..373,305………8.2%

#8. Minnesota…………..1.88%………………$106.29 MILLION………98,028…….8.2%

#9. Washington…………1.86%………………$265.88 MILLION……121,864……..9.4%

#10. New Mexico……….1.83%………………$58.87 MILLION…….36,322…………..6.5%

#11. Indiana……………..1.83%………………..$102.27 MILLION…..116,430……….10.6%

#12. Rhode Island……..1.79%……………….$57.4 MILLION…………..18,839…………..12.1%

#13. Michigan…………..1.60%………………..$380.93 MILLION……….164,589………14.1%

#14.Pennsylvania……….1.60%………………$247.29 MILLION………198,666…………8.2%

#15. Oregon…………….1.55%………………….$83.85 MILLION……….58,831………….12.4%

http://www.cnbc.com/id/31910310?slide=15

State Spending and Budgets. gov

Statistic set below: June 17, 2011 for May 2011.[4]

[edit] Unemployment rate by State or District

State or District↓ Unemployment rate
(seasonally adjusted)↓
Monthly percent change
(negative increase=rise in unemployment)↓
Puerto Rico 16.0 decrease 0.4%
Nevada 12.1 decrease 0.4%
California 11.7 decrease 0.1%
Rhode Island 10.9 steady 0.0%
Florida 10.6 decrease 0.2%
Michigan 10.3 increase 0.1%
Mississippi 10.3 decrease 0.1%
South Carolina 10.0 increase 0.2%
District of Columbia 9.8 increase 0.2%
Georgia 9.8 steady 0.0%
Kentucky 9.8 decrease 0.2%
North Carolina 9.7 steady 0.0%
Tennessee 9.7 increase 0.1%
Alabama 9.6 increase 0.3%
New Jersey 9.4 increase 0.1%
Idaho 9.4 decrease 0.2%
Oregon 9.3 decrease 0.2%
Arizona 9.1 decrease 0.2%
Connecticut 9.1 steady 0.0%
Washington 9.1 decrease 0.1%
United States (national)[5] 9.1 increase 0.1%
Illinois 8.9 increase 0.2%
Missouri 8.9 steady 0.0%
Colorado 8.7 decrease 0.1%
Ohio 8.6 steady 0.0%
West Virginia 8.6 decrease 0.2%
Indiana 8.2 steady 0.0%
Louisiana 8.2 increase 0.1%
Delaware 8.0 decrease 0.2%
Texas 8.0 steady 0.0%
New York 7.9 steady 0.0%
Arkansas 7.8 increase 0.1%
Maine 7.7 increase 0.1%
Massachusetts 7.6 decrease 0.2%
Alaska 7.4 increase 0.1%
Pennsylvania 7.4 decrease 0.1%
Wisconsin 7.4 increase 0.1%
Montana 7.3 steady 0.0%
Utah 7.3 decrease 0.1%
New Mexico 6.9 decrease 0.7%
Maryland 6.8 steady 0.0%
Kansas 6.6 decrease 0.1%
Minnesota 6.6 increase 0.1%
Hawaii 6.0 decrease 0.1%
Iowa 6.0 steady 0.0%
Virginia 6.0 decrease 0.1%
Wyoming 6.0 steady 0.0%
Vermont 5.4 increase 0.1%
Oklahoma 5.3 decrease 0.3%
New Hampshire 4.8 decrease 0.1%
South Dakota 4.8 decrease 0.1%
Nebraska 4.1 decrease 0.1%
North Dakota 3.2 decrease 0.1%


Hey Barack- Alabama’s Unemployment Rate is DOWN since the Passing of THEIR Illegal Immigration Law!

 

Hey Barack- Alabama’s Unemployment Rate is DOWN since the Passing of THEIR Illegal Immigration Law!

Alabama’s ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION LAW is factually working to REDUCE their unemployment!!!

As illegal’s have fled the state by the tens of thousands, the jobs they took – particularly in poultry processing, building trades and transportation – are being filled once again by Alabama citizens. And the unemployment rate in the state has dropped as a result.

Alabama’s unemployment rate fell a half percentage point last month – five times more than the national average of 0.1%.

To further support this trend, in one heavily Hispanic county with one of the highest percentages of illegal alien labor, the drop has been far more dramatic. Alabama House Majority Leader Rep. Micky Hammon, (R-Decatur), said the huge drop in Marshall County showed the power of Alabama’s H.B. 56:

Hammond pointed to Marshall County, which he called “a known hotbed for illegal immigrant labor.” He said the rate there was 8.1 percent for October, down from 8.8 percent in September and 10 percent in June, when the immigration law was signed. “When Marshall County’s unemployment rate drops almost a full 2 percent since the law was signed, it’s difficult to deny the law is having a positive effect on employment,” Hammond said in his statement.

Marshall County Rep. Kerry Rich (R) told WAFF-TV how poultry plants in his county have rapidly replaced illegal workers with legal ones to do the jobs that we are endlessly told “Americans just won’t do”

 


Hey Barack- The CBO has Officially DOWNGRADED your $1 TRILLION Stimulus as a FAILURE!

 

This above graph (minus the red) was put out by OBAMA and his team as to how much HIS $1 TRILLION stimulus would “help” the economy and jobs. Two + years later, we now know that Obama’s $1 TRILLION plundering of tax payers money has done MORE HARM and costs us $TRILLIONS$ in more via tax payers money and interests than had he JUST LEFT IT ALONE!!!!!!!!

The CBO has rescored Obama’s almost $1 TRILLION “stimulus” package of 2009 and they have concluded the following- you know, on Obama’s “I guess those shovel ready jobs were not as shovel ready as we thought… ha ha ha ha…” (youtube video of Obama laughing about what a failure his stimulus package was can be located below)!

WOW, good thing your ineptness ONLY cost us close to $1 TRILLION in tax payers money!!

Washington Times – November 22, 2011

The Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday downgraded its estimate of the benefits of President Obama’s 2009 stimulus package, saying it may have sustained as few as 700,000 jobs at its peak last year and that over the long run it will actually be a net drag on the economy.

CBO has re-evaluated the stimulus every three months, and its estimates for the total cost have varied. Initially the package was pegged at $787 billion, rose as high as $862 billion at one point, and is now projected to be $825 billion once all the money is paid out.

The nonpartisan agency also has changed its model for the spending’s impact on the economy, and the new calculations show the Recovery Act did less than originally projected.

As for the long-term situation, CBO said its basic assumption is that each dollar of additional federal debt crowds out about a third of a dollar’s worth of private domestic capital.

CBO said there is no crowding out in the short term, which is why the Recovery Act boosts the economy in the near term.


Hey Obama – Get Heckled by Occupy Wall Street Lately?

 

 


Hey Barack- Before Demanding Tax Payers to Pay MORE in Taxes, how about YOU get YOUR DEMOCRATS to Pay THEIRS!?

Hey Barack- Before Demanding Tax Payers to Pay MORE in Taxes, how about YOU get YOUR DEMOCRATS to Pay THEIRS!?

Democrats whining about increasing taxes yelling that the Rich need to pay more? How about DEMOCRATS pay their own taxes FIRST?????

Democrats who got caught not paying their taxes:

  1. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., avoided paying $500,000 in taxes on his yacht.
  2. Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., failed to disclose hundreds of thousands of dollars in assets to the IRS.
  3. Barack Obama’s first health and human services nominee, Tom Daschle, failed to pay $128,000 in taxes.
  4. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner failed to pay $34,000 In taxes.
  5. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and her husband had to pay $7,000 in back taxes.
  6. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis’ husband had a tax lien on his business for 16 years.
  7. Nancy Killefer, slated to be the White House chief performance officer, had a $900 lien on her house for failing to pay unemployment taxes for household help.
  8. Lael Brainard, Obama’s nominee for undersecretary of the treasury for international affairs, was late paying property taxes.
  9. Ron Kirk-was Obama’s nomiee for US Trade Representative, failed to pay over $10,000 in taxes
  10. Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill failed to pay over $280,000 in taxes on her personal plane

I could keep going, but my guess is that you get the fr!gg!n point! Do not demand of others to pay MORE in taxes when you do not even pay your OWN or look for loop holes and tax breaks so as not to have to pay your states $500,000 luxury tax on your FOREIGN MADE YACHT DEMOCRAT JOHN KERRY!

So, in short the TOP 1% that Obama is waging a class warfare with, they make 18% of the national income yet already FACTUALLY pay 40%+ of the taxes. So, Obama wants the 1% that already pay 40% of the taxes to pay MORE taxes because they are not paying their fair share?

Oh Obama- your UNION TEACHERS and the Dep of Education FAILED you miserably. Please, in all seriousness sue the ever living CHIT out of them both for scr3wing you out of proper education!!! Thanks- the REAL TAX PAYERS!


Obama’s Occupy Wall Street Protesters Continue with their Disgustingness!!!!!

 

November 17, 2011

Not only are Obama’s Occupy Wall Street Protesters using CHILDREN as human shields in their protests, HAZMAT was called in to clean up over 200 punds of Human Feces at a protest in California!!!

“There’s a whole lot of squatting going on at Camp Poopstock Santa Cruz.”

Apparently the protesters are leaving hundreds-of-pounds of CRAP on the ground to go with their huge outbreak of ringworm and scabies…….


Hey Barack- Where is YOUR WRITTEN Proposal to Cut the US Debt?

Hey Barack – Where is YOUR WRITTEN Proposal to Cut the US Debt?

In THREE YEARS Barack, you have managed to ADD $4.7 TRILLION to our National Debt and YOU keep increasing it with each passing day.

 

The Republicans, via the Paul Ryan plan have a written proposal to cut $6 TRILLION in ten years; a bill that PASSED the Republican HOUSE and died in YOUR DEMOCRAT OWNED SENATE!

The only thing we have heard from you, other than blaming everyone else for YOUR out-of-control spending, your inability to control your own party that controls the SENATE and how INEPT you are on the US economy; the only thing we know that you want to do is to force those in America who actually pay taxes  to pay $1.5 TRILLION more in taxes while cutting $1 TRILLION in defense.

Where is your WRITTEN PROPOSAL to cut spending? What are you going to cut in spending and how much – in DETAIL ON PAPER???

Tic Toc Captain Complainer and Blamer-in-Chief???????????

PS……the Republicans in the Super Committee CONCEEDED to an Increase in Tax REVENUE – not rates- that would close loop holes and tax breaks for the wealthy to the tune of $350 BILLION….yet YOU and the DEMOCRATS refused this because it was not over $1 TRILLION………so, remind the class where the DEMOCRAT written proposal is to cut ENTITLEMENTS?


Tenure for Teachers, or ANY Public Employee Should Not be Permitted to Exist

Originally Posted March 21, 2011 – UPDATED November 21, 2011

 

The above posters are from teachers protesting in Wisconsin in opposition to Governor Scott Walker’s bill. Some how the pictured teachers and the teachers unions believe that behaving in the above manner, shutting down schools and depriving children of an education some how help “promote” their agenda to some who convince Wisconsites that union thuggary and the bastardization of their taxes in order to further Democrat agendas is in the tax payers best interests.

Couple the foul posters with teacher literally pulling children from their classrooms and bringing them to the protest with foul signs while telling them it is okay to acquire FAKE doctors notes for missing school-work helps to further prove their point? ………right, and they wonder why we are ranked so low in education  across the globe!!!

Why should any person who is gainfully employed be permitted to keep their job indefinitly after only 3-5 years of employment?

Where is the accountability? Why are there ZERO performance standards?

The legal PLUNDEIRNG of tax payers money that is then used to continue paying/employing poorly performing teachers or any public worker until they are ready to retire should be ILLEGAL!

 …the real problem with our education system in this country is the teachers’ unions. 

They do everything possible to prevent schools not only from firing lousy teachers, but also from rewarding talented teachers.  Merit pay?  The unions hate it.  Private schools? Hate them too! 

Even though everyone knows they deliver a better education than our public schools, unions fight to keep as many kids as possible locked in failing private schools.  In Wisconsin, we’ve had whole schools shutting down so that lazy teachers can waste their time protesting on the taxpayers’ dime.  Want to improve education in this country?  Then you’ve got to take on the teachers’ unions.

The state of Missouri appears to be leading the way with the correct answer as to how to deal with the government run education system, teachers unions and poorly performing teachers:

In Missouri, the bill could have vast implications, stripping teachers of tenure and slashing pay for thousands who end up with rankings in the lower third of a school’s teachers.

The sponsor, House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee Chairman Scott Dieckhaus, said the competition would improve teaching.

“It’s time we move away from paying people based on how long they’ve been teaching and what piece of paper they have hanging on the wall,” said Dieckhaus, a Republican from Washington and a former high school social studies teacher.

Critics of the tenure system say it locks in bad teachers because firing them takes too long and costs too much for school districts.

The Missouri School Boards Association supports Dieckhaus’ bill because it replaces lifetime tenure for teachers with multiyear contracts, said the group’s lobbyist, Mike Reid.

“Part of that was addressing the effectiveness of teachers and leaders,” Christie said. “I think the pressure is on because even with all the efforts that are going into low-performing schools … people are increasingly recognizing that it really is about the quality of the instruction in all of those classrooms.”

Even without a new state law in Missouri, superintendents from several school districts in the St. Louis area, including St. Louis, Riverview Gardens and Normandy, have said test scores must be part of the teacher evaluation system to ensure students are learning.

“Right now, superintendents are accountable. Principals are accountable. They can be moved at a whim,” St. Louis Superintendent Kelvin Adams said in an interview. “Where the instruction takes place is at the classroom level. How do we know if teachers are performing well? We go make observations, but we don’t have summative data.”


Occupy Wall Street Protests ~v~ Tea Party Rallies: In Pictures

 

Pictures Speak VOLUMES……

 

Left Wing: Occupy Wall Street

 

Right Wing: Tea Party Rally


“In God We Trust” Voted on in the House = Driving the Left Crazy

In God We Trust” was adopted as the official motto of the United States in 1956.  The phrase has appeared on U.S. coins since 1864 and on paper currency since 1957.

 

The motto was placed on United States coins because of the widespread trauma and heightened religious response that existed during the Civil War. “Both [sides of the Civil War] read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other,” spoke President Abraham Lincoln during his Second Inaugural Address (with the Civil War in progress). While the Treasury Department was being actively petitioned by outsiders (such as the Reverend M. R. Watkinson) to add a religious statement to currency as early as November, 1861, Treasury Secretary Chase did not approve the precise “In God We Trust” until December 9, 1863.

 

For the love of  GOD!

That’s right you Atheist God hating people- I said it!

I have found my self lauging at the Atheist getting all HELL bent out-of-shape over this as though their whole world will now crumble as they will some how be forced to believe in God now.

Laughable, well really it is pathetically sad!

Because I see a piece of paper, some money or some other OBJECT with the word GOD, Jesus or a Cross on it, does it mean I must believe in the three? WOW, if I can be forced to believe in something simply because it is put on an object, well then I would have the issue rather than the person/group of people putting the information on said object.

Then, I found my self having to educate the  poorly uneducated left wing loons-thanks to the Dep of Education- and the Atheists, my bad as I guess they are the same group of people, on our Founding Fathers. It seems they truly believe that our Founding Fathers were NOT Christians and that America was not founded on Christian principles.

WRONG!

So, let’s edumacate some lefties today shall we?

First and Foremost, they argue that our Founding Fathers were Deists. The FACT is, there were OVER 50 Founding Fathers and NO, they were not all Deists. Yes, there were some who were, but CLEARLY Atheists have no clue what a Deist really is, therefore let’s give a brief definition:

Diest: “One who believes in the existence of a God or supreme being but denies revealed religion, basing his belief on the light of nature and reason.” Deists reject the Judeo-Christian accounts of God as well as the Bible. They do believe that God is eternal and good, but flatly reject having a relationship with Him through Christ.

#1. It appears that they like to use the 1797 Treaty of Peace and Friendship with Tripoli as evidence that we are not a Christian Nation. What they PURPOSELY FAIL to note is that in Article XI that “the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, when the treaty was renegotiated eight years later, Article XI was dropped .

” Some view this as “a smoking gun” that America was not founded as a Christian nation, while others argue that it was simply a concession to the Muslim nation (when the treaty was renegotiated eight years later, Article XI was dropped).

#2. John Adams

The second President (or tenth if you consider John Hanson the first) wrote to Thomas Jefferson on June 28, 1813:

The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were. . . . the general principles of Christianity. . . . I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God; and that those principles of liberty are as unalterable as human nature.

However, Adams is often quoted as saying, “This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion in it!” However, here’s the completequotation in an April 19, 1817, letter to Thomas Jefferson:

Twenty times in the course of my late reading have I been on the point of breaking out, “This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religion at all!!!” But in this exclamation I would have been as fanatical as Bryant or Cleverly. Without religion, this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company, I mean hell.

As a Unitarian, Adams flatly denied the doctrine of eternal punishment believing all would eventually enter heaven. (Many Unitarians reject the Trinity and most accept all religions as valid expressions of faith.) But being a good Unitarian, he was certainly open to the teachings of Christ

Jesus is benevolence personified, an example for all men. . . . The Christian religion, in its primitive purity and simplicity, I have entertained for more than sixty years. It is the religion of reason, equity, and love; it is the religion of the head and the heart (Letter to F.A. Van Der Kemp, December 27, 1816).

#3. Samuel Adams

Samuel Adams organized the Boston Tea Party, and served as Governor of Massachusetts, a delegate to the Continental congress, and a signer of the Declaration of Independence.

In his 1772 work, The Rights of the Colonists, Adams wrote:

II. The Rights of the Colonists as Christians.

The right to freedom being the gift of the Almighty…The rights of the colonists as Christians…may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institutions of The Great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament.

In his Last Will and Testament he wrote:

Principally, and first of all, I resign my soul to the Almighty Being who gave it, and my body I commit to the dust, relying on the merits of Jesus Christ for the pardon of my sins.

#4. Alexander Hamilton

The Episcopalian authored many of the Federalist Papers,signed the Constitution, and became the first Secretary of the Treasury. In an April 1802 letter to James A. Bayard, Hamilton proposed The Christian Constitutional Society:

In my opinion, the present constitution is the standard to which we are to cling. Under its banner bona fide must we combat our political foes, rejecting all changes but through the channel itself provided for amendments. By these general views of the subject have my reflections been guided. I now offer you the outline of the plan they have suggested. Let an association be formed to be denominated “The Christian Constitutional Society,” its object to be first: The support of the Christian religion. second: The support of the United States.

Hamilton was shot and killed by Aaron Burr in a duel on July 12, 1804. His last dying words reportedly were:

I have a tender reliance on the mercy of the Almighty, through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ. I am a sinner. I look to Him for mercy; pray for me.

#5. Patrick Henry

Best known for his “give me liberty or give me death” speech on March 23, 1775, he became the first governor of Virginia.

One of his most famous quotations, cannot be verified, although it’s used by many Christian ministers: “It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the gospel of Jesus Christ!” It’s not found anywhere in his recorded writings or speeches.

However, here’s a verified quotation from a letter to his daughter dated August 20, 1796:

Amongst other strange things said of me, I hear it is said by the deists that I am one of the number; and indeed, that some good people think I am no Christian. This thought gives me much more pain than the appellation of Tory; because I think religion of infinitely higher importance than politics; and I find much cause to reproach myself that I have lived so long, and have given no decided and public proofs of my being a Christian. But, indeed, my dear child, this is a character which I prize far above all this world has, or can boast.

And in his will

This is all the inheritance I give to my dear family. The religion of Christ will give them one which will make them rich indeed.

#6. John Jay

One of the authors of the Federalist Papersand first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Jay wrote to Rev. Uzal Ogden, on February 14, 1796:

I have long been of opinion that the evidence of the truth of Christianity requires only to be carefully examined to produce conviction in candid minds. . . .

And in an April 23, 1811, letter to John Bristed, April 23, 1811, he wrote:

While in France . . . I do not recollect to have had more than two conversations with atheists about their tenents. The first was this: I was at a large party, of which were several of that description. They spoke freely and contemptuously of religion. I took no part in the conversation. In the course of it, one of them asked me if I believed in Christ? I answered that I did, and that I thanked God that I did.

#7. Thomas Jefferson

The writer of the Declaration of Independence and the third President of the United States wrote to Charles Thomson in 1816:

I, too, have made a wee-little book from the same materials, which I call the Philosophy of Jesus; it is a paradigma of his doctrines, made by cutting the texts out of the book, and arranging them on the pages of a blank book, in a certain order of time or subject. A more beautiful or precious morsel of ethics I have never seen; it is a document in proof that I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.

Jefferson was a Deist who respected Christ’s teachings, but rejected His divinity, His miracles, and His resurrection.

#8. George Washington

In his Speech to Delaware Indian Chiefs on May 12, 1779, Washington said:

You do well to wish to learn our arts and our ways of life and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are. Congress will do everything they can to assist you in this wise intention.

 

The Constitution Before Darwin

 

To the framers of the Constitution, the idea of having a government not based on God would have been unthinkable. It is important to remember that when the Constitution was written, the only possible explanation for the existence of the Universe was special creation. Therefore, all of the delegates at the Philadelphia convention were creationist. This is the reason the framers did not create a “secular” state in the modern sense of the term. Indeed, the concept of “secularism” as it is used today didn’t even exist in 1787. It is largely a twentieth century concept. Since the framers of our Constitution predated Darwin and the theory of evolution, the desire to have a “secular” state would have made as much sense to them as Egyptian hieroglyphics. It is only with the advent of Darwin and an alternative explanation for the existence of the Universe that a secular state becomes desirable. There were atheists in 1787 to be sure but they lacked a coherent scientific explanation for the existence of the Universe.

At the same time, the framers of our Constitution did not want America to become a theocracy. They did not believe in a theocratic state. The framers of our Constitution did not want clergymen to pick the Presidents and set government policy. However, this is not to say that they saw no role for religion in government. The framers most certainly did believe that religion and religious values should influence the government and its policies. George Washington’s first Proclamation as President made this abundantly clear. On the day that Congress finished its work on the First Amendment, it called on President George Washington to issue a Proclamation to the people of the United States to thank God for the freedoms we enjoy. A week and a day later the President’s opening paragraph in his Proclamation said: “Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor . . .” Note 2. The words “to obey His will” are fatal to any suggestion that George Washington and the framers of our Constitution believed in “secularism.” In America, religious values influence government policy through the vote of the people.

 

Where is “God” in the Preamble to the Constitution?

Secularists are very quick to point out that the word “God” does not appear in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution. They claim that this is highly significant. It proves that the United States should not be ‘under God’ in their opinion. Of course, they are correct in one point. The word “God” does not appear in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution or anywhere else. However, it is doubtful that this fact has the kind of significance they claim it has. Generally, the word “God” will appear in two places in most constitutions. The first place is in the preamble to the constitution. The second place is in the religion clauses in the bill of rights. For example, the word “God” appears in the preamble in eight state constitutions. In four states, the “Supreme Ruler of the Universe” is used instead. By far, the most popular divine reference in a preamble is “Almighty God.” This appears in the preamble of 30 state constitutions. In some states, the state constitution does not have a preamble. However, a divine reference can be found in the religion clauses in the bill of rights in each instance. There is only one state constitution which has a preamble that does not have a divine reference of any kind. This is the Constitution of Oregon. But here the words “Almighty God” appear in the state religion clauses. In the case of the U.S. Constitution however, no divine reference appears in either the Preamble or in the religion clauses in the First Amendment. Why is this true?

The most likely reason why the word “God” does not appear in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution is textual. The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution is modeled after the Preamble in the Articles of Confederation. Since the Articles of Confederation did not use the word “God” in the Preamble, this is the most likely reason it does not appear in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution. The Preamble in the Articles of Confederation began by listing all 13 states. It began as follows: “Articles of Confederation and perpetual union between New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, etc. . . . and Georgia.” When the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution was first drafted, this was the model that was used. Later, as the constitutional convention was coming to a close, a short form was agreed to. The 13 states were dropped in favor of the much simpler form We the People.Thus, rather than trying to establish a radical godless state, the most likely reason the word “God” does not appear in the Preamble was because the Articles of Confederation did not have it. It is doubtful that anyone in 1787 could have foreseen the development of radical secularists groups like the ACLU and their ‘spin’ on the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution.