New Preamble to the Constitution



This is probably the best e-mail I’ve seen in a long, long time. The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA. This guy should run for President one day…

“We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights.”

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone — not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes …

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we’re just not interested in public health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don’t be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don’t be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won’t have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don’t care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (Lastly….)

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country’s history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!


15 responses to “New Preamble to the Constitution

  • Joe Mears

    My God I wish all women were like you. You are a breath of fresh air, may God bless you!!!MARRY ME!!!! lol

    seriously, that you putting up such a wonderful website!



    • specfriggintacular

      LOL… are too funny! I wish I could take credit for this. I figured the least I could do was to repost some FRIGGIN COMMON SENSE! It seems those some within our country deem themsleves either entitle to whatever with little effort or they deem it necessary to take from those who do work for it and give it to those who do not.

  • Rodney

    The founding fathers surely Revolted from Great Brittain because the King was trying to do too much for the people. They were so angry that the king was trying to give all the peseants a decent living, protection from entities that want to exploit them, and health and wealth benefits, that they said Enough! They used their perfect omnipotence and god like powers (imbued to them by our inherent Christian nation) to construct a perfect document, flawless in every way, to stop anyone from ever taking care of anyone else ever again. To prove their infalliability, they constructed the Constitution so that no one can ever change it or interpret it, ever! Thanks founding fathers.

    • specfriggintacular

      The king was trying to do too much for the people? Which history book did you educate yourself from, the one that has been highjacked and bastardized in the name of political correctness? They left do dig themselves out from complete governmental rule and to be allowed to worship and pray to any religion without the fear of persecution. They were angry that the king was taking from those and giving to others, a means of legal plundering.

      If I were to take something from you and use it for my own personal use because I felt I needed it to help me get ahead in life, I would be arrested for theft, robbery or aggrevated robbery depending on what was used to committ the offense. Please tell me you understand this?

      Exploit them and health benefits? Child Labor in Europe ring any bells? They did have this over there didn’t they, or am I imagining this? They were presecuted for not believing and worshiping a specific religion were they not?
      “Nonconformists could expect no mercy and might be executed as heretics”….but I am sure you missed this part of your history class, huh?

      I suppose you are one of those whom believes that the Civil War was started over nothing more than slavery-yes? Interesting to see how again our history has been bastardized to fit a political agenda and done so all in the name of political correctness.

      The Secession of the South over the North began with the fact that the government was taxing Southern states 80% and not doing so to the northern states. They were taking this outrageous tax and using it to build roads, bridges, building, etc…. and not doing so for the South. This in itself began the sucession and the slavery issue added fuel to the fire. You do understand that Lincoln did not even make the ending of slavery part of the war until TWO years into the war-please tell me you were taught this?!

      Today, we have he government once again getting too big for its britches and trying to control too many things without the states approval. There is a reason why the 10th Amendment was added to the Constitution-it was because the forefathers knew what would happen if the government acquire too much control-which is what is happening today.

      • Rodney

        I was being sarcastic. My point is that again and again, the conservatives conjure up the founding fathers and the constitution as though it were written as a tribute to capitolizm. My point is that the conservatives feel they are losing the country every time the government wants to extend an entitlement to the people. My point is that the founding fathers revolted because the king exploited them, starved them, stole from them, ignored them, and oppressed them. They did not revolt because the king tried to do too many things to help them. I apologize if my sarcasm was lost on you. I doubt the revolution would have ever happened if the king had thrown as much money and benefits at his people as our government has. It is a disengenuous argument for modern day conservatives to equate health care reform with 18th century tyrannical monarchical rule. You can call it tyranny when the government starts to impede on your liberties, oh wait, I forgot about the patriot act! too late…

      • Frederick Fortin

        I am asking for your help to sponsor a bill that will give America back to the people. CLEAR and SIMPLE voter law.,BY PROXY our founding fathers chose to elect reps to send to Washington and speak in our behalf.In our lifetime we have seen our freedoms and way of life eroded by politicians who don’t have a clear mandate because of how our system has evolved.Its time we withdraw Our PROXY using this new law.Clear and simple voting would be done on a second net created just for eligible voters.It would work just like town hall meetings. All new laws from legislators proposed by local,state,and federal government. could be voted on line by line .Each citizen would now vote instantly without the help of a PROXY, the legislature..My bill would allow every American to vote on every law pending and review the past obsolete laws that are un needed or unwanted.It would be fast, inexpensive,and quickly tabulated.Reps and public servants who tho-rt the
        will of the people could be removed with a fast recall vote from the people they represent.No law is passed without the clear and simple majority vote from the people who have to live under the laws just as our founding fathers intended.The power and rights of the people will never again be removed by the illegitimate power of this government. July 1 2009 I would like to network with anyone who is interested in changing our government.The time has come to return arrogant politicians to the unemployment

      • Pappadave

        Well, Rodney, the point today is that, in order to “give” stuff to people, the government MUST first TAKE that “stuff” away from the people who worked to earn it. It’s called THEFT–“The taking of property of another by force or the threat of force and converting it to one’s own use…or to the use of another–not the owner.” It’s done, in most cases, in order to “buy” the electoral support of the recipients of this phony “largesse.” How many people do you think voted for Obama both times because they were convinced that he and his administration would “give” them more “stuff?”

  • Rodney

    re: Article XI plus “in god we trust” as well as “under god” were not added to money/pledge until 1954 after the “red” scare as a way to weed out communists. in the 180 + years prior, God was not mentioned by name in government documents.

    • pappad

      Wrong. “In God we trust” was added to our currency in the 19th Century. What part of “endowed by our CREATOR” do you not understand as referring to God? THAT document was written in 1776.

  • John


    Using the Patriot Act that Obama voted for and which is still in use today as a defense to your insane arguement shows you have no clue what you are talking about.

  • Edward Dennis

    Please send new preamble to the constitution via email.

  • Claudia Smith (@Irislogu)

    This is awesome and I am sharing with my facebook friends. God Bless Texas and all Americans who think for themselves and work hard to feed their own children.

  • pappad

    Looks like this site has been hacked.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: