Monthly Archives: February 2010

Left Wing Extremism?

In light of the incident in Austin, Texas yesterday, liberal bloggers are foaming at the mouth to blame the “right wing” media and tea parties for what took place. Really? To take it a step further, they are now arguing as to whether or not to call it domestic terrorism.

Interesting, maybe they should ask their good ol’ buddy William Ayers if it was? Or their awesome people at ELF or PETA, I think they all know a tad more about domestic terrorism than do those who belong to Tea Parties!

Moving on…. in a clip from a fox news article: 

DHS officials explicitly warned against the potential emergence of terrorist groups or “lone wolf extremists” in a report issued in April. The report, “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” found that while no specific threat existed, there was the potential for violence from extremists concerned about illegal immigration, abortion, increased federal power and restrictions on firearms.

Interesing! If the DHS identified “Rightwing Extremism” as above, then what is “Left Wing Extremism”? That there is a potential for violence from extremists concerned about not giving terrorist enough rights that Americans deserve, not being able to accuse everyone as being racist if you do not agree with nor conceed to what they want, not enough illegal immigration, not enough abortions, decreased federal power and not enough restrictions on firearms?

 

I mean really?

An interesting tid bit from a study conducted for the 2001 DOE “Left Wing Extremism” document

Domestic groups and state-sponsored cells and individuals have continued their espionage activities and the planning of terrorist actions against the U.S. government. Leftist extremists were responsible for three-fourths of the officially designated acts of terrorism in America in the 1980s. From an international perspective, of the 13,858 people who died between 1988 and 1998 in attacks committed by the 10 most active terrorist groups in the world, 74 percent were killed by leftist organizations.

Advertisements

Tim Tebow-Tebow’s Super Bowl ad isn’t intolerant; its critics are

Tim Tebow has done more to help those less fortunate in his mere 22+ years of existance than the vast majority of American have done in the entire lives-yes the far left in this country want to hang him up to dry for airing a commerical that merely promotes "the family", one that says nothing about damning people for having an abortion.

I am perplexed when I see American’s fawning over imbecile, drug and alcohol dependent, wife beating, DWI murdering movie and pop stars. “Stars” whose only real objective is not to stand up for what is right for all people but rather to represent what is in their own best interest or their own beliefs.

Instead, “Here’s what we do need a lot more of: Tebows. Collegians who are selfless enough to choose not to spend summers poolside, but travel to impoverished countries to dispense medical care to children, as Tebow has every summer of his career. Athletes who believe in something other than themselves, and are willing to put their backbone where their mouth is. Celebrities who are self-possessed and self-controlled enough to use their wattage to advertise commitment over decadence.”

I read this article yesterday and for once, in a very long while I was taken back to how true journalist should write. I am not stating that I am taken back because the article may comply with my beliefs or because a woman wrote the article, rather the article is outstanding in the sense that the author dared to do the one thing that is needed desperately during this time of BS journalism and craptastic media anchor men and women who probably do not even deserve the right to write obituaries-she reported the news as it truly should be reported.

Better yet, she chose to write the article going against her pro-choice views and wrote about what is ailing America-stupidity, ignorance, laziness and greed at ALL costs.

Feminist groups are foaming at the mouth because the ad-which has not even been advertised yet-is some how downing a woman’s right to choose, however like the author of the article states, the only group here that is demeaning a woman’s right to choose are the morons within these feminists groups.

A woman’s right to choose is just that-the right to choose not to have an abortion or the right to have an abortion without being accosted, jailed or otherwise treated in a harmful manner. Therefore, if a woman chooses NOT to have an abortion should she not be offered the same in kind, or do we burn our bra’s, drop some acid, blowup buildings and tell women that they suck because they choose to have their child or because they choose not to work and become stay-at-home-moms?

I mean, what happened to “freedom of speech”? If we, as taxpayers have to UNWILLINGLY give our money-in the form of taxes paid-to planned parenthood, which turns around and performs tens-of-thousands of abortions annually then why can’t Tim Tebow air a commerical about “the family” paid for with PRIVATE funds?

“Dwindling Organizations of Ladies in Lockstep,” otherwise known as DOLL,

“National Organization of Fewer and Fewer Women All The Time.”

“The National Organization for Women Who Only Think Like Us”

The mentality of these feminist groups is disgusting, which is the main reason why you see the memberships within these groups dwindling at obscene rates.

I will end with the authors ending paragraph with the hopes that 1)You will venture to the site and read the article in its entirety, but 2) That you lead your life with an open mind rather than one that has been brainwashed by a shitty public education system that puts poor me and handout attitudes above self accountability and hard work!