Fathom the hypocrisy of a group within society exploiting the atrociousness of the divisiveness and violence within said society only to turn around and encourage, rather incite the further divisiveness and violence within that same society. Whether you subscribe to the notion that the US has become a police state or not is irrelevant for it is this very group above that seeks further power via turning society on itself; in order to do so you must further divide a society and incite violence. All one needs is the perfect igniting point. Divide and Conquer.
Sound familiar yet?
Need a currently media driven situation? Watch Marco Polo and really “see” the internal conflict that is bestowed upon Khan, not because “He” views it this way rather because of circumstance and what OTHERS feed him.
Machiavelli identifies a similar application to military strategy, [but likewise used in principle applied to politics within society] that a Captain should endeavor with every art to divide the forces of the enemy, either by making him suspicious of his men in whom he trusted, or by giving him cause that he has to separate his forces, and, because of this, become weaker.
Ismaayil AbdullahBrinsley’s murdering of two NYPD officers was not a coincidence, rather it was systematic by design.
What better way to divide Americans than via race relations? When you look at American history from slavery to the Civil Rights movement, it is not hard to incite hatred within a society when you continually keep open such a deep-rooted wound refusing to allow it to heal.
As Booker T Washington stated over 100 years ago – “There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs – partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.”
Queue Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Eric Holder, Barack Obama et al.
I am afraid that there is a certain class of race problem solvers who don’t want the patient to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public. ~ Booker T Washington
For Sharpton, Jackson, Holder et al, Garner and Brown are irrelevant here, they care not what took place and why, clearly because forensic scientific evidence they choose to ignore as it does not play into their ultimate plan, which is to systematically change/transform America.
Like Garner and Brown (though the prosecutor refuses to release his juvenile record in its entirety), “Records show Brinsley has been arrested several times in New York, Georgia, and Ohio, with charges including robbery and assault.” Some argue that his past criminal record is irrelevant, just like they argued Brown and Garners was, however it goes to establish a pattern, a pattern that demonstrates there was a violent nature and disdain for laws and the police with respect to all three.
Some will claim that the officers shot were not “white”, but on the contrary all that mattered was that the officers “appeared white“; that they were not “black”. The end goal, “kill all white cops”.
I’m curious, does anyone subscribe to the asinine logic that if a black man engages in a shooting rampage that ends the lives of two police officers, who “appear white”, helps the cause to alleviate the notion that violence is more rampant within the black community than other races?
This entry was posted on Sunday, November 29th, 2015 at 3:30 am and posted in Open Discussion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
“But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.”... “Now, legal plunder can be committed in an infinite number of ways. Thus we have an infinite number of plans for organizing it: tariffs, protection, benefits, subsidies, encouragements, progressive taxation, public schools, guaranteed jobs, guaranteed profits, minimum wages, a right to relief, a right to the tools of labor, free credit, and so on, and so on.” ― Frédéric Bastiat, The Law